Ladies and gentlemen, the inimitable George Carlin, may he rest in peace, from his “Life Is Worth Losing” tour, recorded Anno Domini 2005 11 05, Beacon Theater, New York City, New York. (Warning: strong language.) If you listen, he actually says, “By the way it’s the same big club that they beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe…”
It is a big club, and you are not in it. Oh, you might be from a working class background and have some success. You might be from a middle class academic family, like mine, and have some success. You might be from an upper middle class background and have some success. But you aren’t part of the 0.1% or you would not be reading this essay.
The purpose of the system of usurpation masquerading as a government of the consent of the people is to distort markets, pick winners, and enrich the politicians and bureau-rats through various forms of bribery that are allowed, sanctioned, or given a free pass through the bribing of the “justice” system. Oh, but such things cannot go un-noticed, so it was also necessary for the usurpers to gain control of the bulk of the “fourth estate” to keep the journalists from being too obstreperous about reporting the actual truth. It’s a powerful grift, but, in the end, the grifters aren’t gifted and the club is just a bundle of sticks.
When I write about usurpation, I believe the three centres of grift are London, the Vatican, and the District of Corruption. For various reasons, both historical and spiritual, these three places came to be controlled by freemasons who worship demons. They intend to enslave mankind. God has other intentions.
Hanoverian Usurpation
It is a fact that there was an English royal family in Anno Domini 1688 that were the Stuart family. James II was king and had a son by his second wife, Mary of Modena. The son’s name was James Francis Edward Stuart. He was born on AD 1688 06 10. His birth precipitated the “Glorious Revolution.” For, as the first born son of the king, under the rules of primogeniture, he became the heir apparent to the throne.
The mother of the newborn child’s two half sisters had passed away in 1671. She was Anne Hyde. His half sisters were Mary Stuart (born in 1662) and Anne Stuart (born in the plague year 1665). In those days, everyone knew the difference between men and women and there was no confusion about which was which and who was who. Matters relating to gender were not absurd, but matters relating to religion were. Anne Hyde’s daughters were raised Protestant. Mary of Modena’s son was raised Catholic. Anticipating that a Catholic boy would eventually succeed James II, various factions within England acted to transfer power to a Protestant monarch.
This particular issue certainly bears further discussion, in the fullness of time. My own spiritual path brought me to the religious society of the friends of Jesus, the people known as Quakers, in 2017. I believe it was the voice of Jesus speaking to George Fox in 1649, the year that Charles the first was beheaded at the banqueting house in London, when George was confused about the available established and non-conformist religious leadership in England. Jesus said, “There is even one, Christ Jesus, who can speak to thy condition.” After all, Jesus had extreme difficulty because of the secular and religious authorities in Jerusalem under Pontius Pilate. Jesus was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into hell. On the third day, He arose again from the dead. He ascended into heaven, sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Almighty, from where He will come to judge the living and the dead.
For me, the term “catholic” has one clear meaning: universal. Jesus did not found a confusion of dozens of sects and hierarchies and diverging opinions. Jesus founded one holy and apostolic church for all who hear His words and do them. It is men who have made a mess of that situation. In many specific instances, it is men who worship demons, including the freemasons, who have made things go awry.
Jesus did not and does not set His followers and disciples to seek power and make enemies and have religious wars like the Thirty Years War to slaughter and pillage for control of European nation states. On the contrary, if you read the actual words of Jesus, you see that He teaches us to be humble, to have the first be last, to love our enemies. Jesus washed the feet of His disciples. Jesus, the king of heaven and earth, the son of God the Father Almighty, humbled himself and washed the feet of the apostles to illustrate that we are to care for one another, not tax and regulate and murder one another.
So, for parliament to declare that anyone who is not a member of a Protestant sect cannot be king of England is to defy God.
Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. ~ Acts 5:29
Further to this point, it seems evident that by the time of the so-called Glorious Revolution in 1688, people in England and throughout Europe were mostly oblivious to the fact that Jesus Christ rules and reigns. No king but Jesus. So the entire idea of monarchy as it is implemented by the European aristocracy is itself an attempted usurpation of God’s power. Let us return to our narrative and see what happened next.
The prince of Orange, a Dutch fellow named William, was married to Mary Stuart, and they were invited to come live in the royal palaces as William and Mary. Mary, and her sister Anne, were the children of James II. James was Catholic, Mary and Anne were Protestant. Under various acts of parliament, including the so-called “act of settlement” of 1701, only the Protestant members of the line were allowed to become monarchs in England and, subsequently, Britain.
James II was a brilliant naval commander and had other good qualities, but he was not a Protestant. His reign was tolerated by the otherwise intolerant Anglican “established” church, because they anticipated one of his Protestant daughters would reign after he had passed away. He did try to resolve the problem of intolerance in his kingdom by issuing an act of indulgence declaring not only that people were free to worship as they saw fit in their own homes and chapels, but also eliminating the requirement of any particular profession of faith to hold public office. Seven bishops of the Anglican faith defied his decree, were charged with sedition, held in the Tower of London, were tried, and were acquitted. Their release led to anti-Catholic rioting.
Rather than resolving any of the issues relating to factions within Christendom, or making any effort to forgive their enemies, the prominent power in England usurped the throne by the Glorious Revolution. William III and his wife Mary II took the throne and jointly ruled until Mary died in 1694. Then William ruled on his own until his death in 1702. During that time, James II contested the claims that he had abdicated or “vacated” the throne, and fought a series of battles until he was defeated at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Thereafter he lived in exile until his death in 1701.
With James II now dead, legitimate succession passed to his eldest son and heir James Francis Edward Stuart. But there was no coronation for the thirteen year old since his family didn’t control the “seat of power” in London. Instead, William III continued to rule until 1702 at which point the half-sister of the rightful heir, Anne Stuart, was placed on the throne of England. She ruled as queen of England until the act of union claimed to subjugate Scotland in 1707, after which she ruled as queen of Great Britain. In her turn, she passed away in 1714.
Instead of power reverting to her half brother James Francis Edward Stuart, it was required by the act of settlement of 1701 to be passed to the daughter of Elizabeth Stuart, the “winter queen” of Bohemia. Sophia of Hanover was the daughter of the sister of Charles the first of England, but Sophie also passed away in 1714, shortly before the death of queen Anne. So, again, in defiance of primogeniture and against the will of the adherents of young James, now 26, Sophia’s son George was crowned king of “Great” Britain. Inevitably, this further usurpation was contested by James Stuart, in 1715, 1719, and 1745, as well as by his adherents. Various descendants can pursue their claims to the throne of England and Great Britain if they wish. It matters nought to me.
I will say, on a personal note, that my family certainly supported the rightful heir in 1715, 1719, and 1745. The Davidson clan live in the Highlands around Inverness, especially near Tulloch Castle. My lot, as we say, were cleared off during the evil, cruel, hateful, spiteful, mean-spirited Highlands Clearances after the ‘45. My dad did some study of his particular line of descent and concludes that we arrived in New York harbour in 1746 after being deported from Aberdeen, sentenced to “transportation for life to Virginia colony.” The story, as I have it, is that there was a storm at sea and the ship was blown off course, so made landfall at New York. There, the captain wanted to offload his “cargo” including my ancestors, and the harbour master wanted the duty to be paid. The new “owner” was far away, and the cost of sitting idle in port grated on the captain. So, he asked “and what if they are passengers” and was told, “then they are free to go and so are you.” Thus, as the story goes, he went into his cabin and burned the indentures. God’s will be done.
Hamiltonian Usurpation 1787
To a considerable extent, the usurpation of 1688 infects many subsequent events. And I’m not saying that it was entirely bad people and bad ideas behind them. After all, to put a bouquet of roses on the rotten mess they were making, the freemasons wrote some pretty good essays and threw together a declaration of rights that I reviewed recently. They would argue that the usurpation was “bloodless” in that not a large number of street battles actually took place. The “Whig militias” were deployed very effectively and there wasn’t much structured opposition at the time.
Of course, there were a large number of battles to attempt restore the Stuart line, but these are ignored by the freemasons in their versions of history. And the struggle over who was the legitimate ruler of England and Scotland affected many families that were deported for being on the “wrong” side of the issue. To where were they deported? Why here, to “America.” Later, to Botany Bay (1788 and following).
Which brings us to the first of the world wars. No, not the events orchestrated by the Rhodes/Milner conspiracy of 1913-1919, but the actual first war that transcended continental boundaries and took place in the seas of the Western hemisphere, in the seas around India, and amongst many of the European imperial powers. I speak of the “Seven Years war” of 1756 to 1763 which consolidated quite a lot of French and Spanish territories under British occupation and control. This war is known to Americans as “The French and Indian war” and includes the early military exploits of George Washington - who knew very little of strategy and tactics and learned nearly nothing from his errors.
The belligerents for the Seven Years war and the contemporaneous French & Indian war were the major powers of Europe, a number of important powers in Asia, and quite a few Native American sovereignties. On the one side were Great Britain, Hanover, Prussia, Portugal, Hesse-Kassel, Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel, Schaumburg-Lippe, the Russian empire (after 1762), East India Company, Carnatic Sultanate, Hyderabad state, state of India, Filipino rebels, British colonies of North America, Iroquois confederacy, Wyandot of Ohio country, Catawba, Cherokee nation, Mingo, Lenape, British West Indies, and the state of Brazil.
On the other side were France, Austria, Saxony, Hesse-Darmstadt, Russia (until 1762), Spain, Sweden, Kalmykia, French East India company, Mughal Empire, Bengal Subah, New Spain, Dutch East India Company (VOC), New France, French Colony of Canada, Wabanaki, Abenaki, Mi’kmaq, Algonquin nation, Lenape (until 1758), Ojibwe, Odawa, Shawnee, Mississauga, Potawatomi, Wyandot of Fort Detroit, New Spain, New Granada, Peru, and the French West Indies. (These two belligerent lists are from Wikipedia. Because the conflict is far enough in the past it is not one of the most offensive Wikipedia entries. I generally don’t rely on Wikipedia for recent events because they are now largely an organ of the deep state. The idea of a reader-edited general knowledge encyclopedia isn’t bad but it has apparently been a source of information too important to be left uncontrolled by the psychotic mass murdering demon worshippers in Mordor-on-the-Potomac. Hat tip Skip the Free Rifleman.)
I make mention of this war for several reasons. First, if you want to understand American history, you should at least be aware that the Seven Years war was fought and that amongst its other outcomes, the British empire “won” various peace treaty outcomes. Second, you need to be aware that, just as the Versailles treaty of 1919 would set up conditions for another world war within a generation, so too the treaties settling the Seven Years war set up conditions that led to the American revolutionary war which was, itself, a world-wide conflict. Among those conditions, the victorious Brits chose to impose the high costs of the war on the colonists in North America through evil regulations and confiscatory taxation. To which the colonists said, beginning in 1770, “we’ll just see about that.”
The American Revolutionary war and the contemporaneous Anglo-French war involved not only the United States and Britain, but also the French, Spanish, Dutch, and Russian empires, as well as provinces in India. You can find hundreds of worthy histories of the American Revolution and I prefer to leave its particulars to you. But there are some things that are worth mentioning.
For example, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union that were used to establish the United States (and under which it elected its first series of presidents Peyton Randolph to Cyrus Griffin) were established in 1777 and fully ratified in 1781. They were overthrown in 1787 at an illegal convention of delegates in Philadelphia. I refer to this convention as the Hamiltonian Usurpation. Alexander Hamilton didn’t want Americans to be free, he wanted them to be enslaved on a national plantation. In this desire he was joined by plantation owners George Washington, James Madison, and others. To give you a sense of what an extremity it was, the delegates to the illegal Philadelphia “constitutional” convention swore a blood oath of secrecy that the proceedings would not be recorded. Except for one gentleman who made notes every evening, we have no certain understanding of what was said and done, except that a messy constitution with a lot of powers for the nationalist government was an outcome, and no bill of rights was provided in the original.
The arguments against the constitution are many and varied and deserve to prevail. Many of them were made at the time by the Anti-Federalists, about whom one doesn’t hear much except in certain rarefied studies of history. Patrick Henry, Melancton Smith, and many others were of one mind. The framers of the constitution had no authority to write “we the people” at the top of their document, and no authority to overthrow the government of the United States. But they were successful in substituting the strong central government they wanted for the strong state governments with a properly restricted and limited central government that came before. And we are all worse off than we would be as a result.
In overthrowing the articles of confederation, one state stood firm against the usurpation. Rhode Island did not want to ratify. So it was embargoed, several of its cities threatened secession, and in effect the other states declared war on it until ratification was obtained. You can look it up.
My point here is to suggest that even though the constitution has limits to power, essentially none of those have been enforced in over a century, especially against the greatest gluttons for accumulating power, the deep state agencies of the fbi, cia, nsa, and military. The usurpations inherent in the long train of abuses cited in the American Declaration of Independence against the parliament and monarchy of Britain were restored, in some cases immediately and in others slowly over time, so that the independence and individual sovereignty sought by those declaring independence in 1776 were buried by 1789. My friend Bill Buppert says it clearly: “The constitution is the casket in which they buried the declaration.”
Media Usurpation 1895
Quite a lot can be said about the consolidation of magazines and newspapers during the decade of the 1890s into the hands of a few owners. I believe for various reasons that quite a lot of this consolidation was planned and implemented before 1895 with the intention of having more effective control over the outcome of the 1896 presidential election. Over the following decades, more and more consolidation occurred so that today most of the film, publishing, newspaper, magazine, radio, television, cable, and news distribution organisations are owned by roughly 5 big companies.
The purpose of this usurpation has been to control the distribution of information for the explicit purpose of propaganda. The goal is a fight over power and money to limit your political, financial, and individual choices in all things. Simply put, the people who lobbied for the licensing of radio and television broadcasts (and in the UK the licensing of radio and television receivers) want to own you. George Carlin, in his stand up routine linked above, indicates his view that they do own you. I disagree in some particulars with his conclusions, but not with the tenor of his comments.
The question that I seek to answer further along in this essay is: given a long train of abuses and usurpations, what should we do?
Currency Usurpation 1913
The advantage of having an active propaganda machine operating from 1895 to present has been the election of abject liars like racist nationalist socialist Woodrow Wilson and his brother progressive, Teddy Roosevelt. Together they did about as much to pioneer in the establishment of the deep state, with TR’s fbi to investigate congress critters and extort their cooperation, and Wilson’s “black chamber” to look at copies of all telegrams, all international letters, and listen in on every phone call out of the country. All of these systems of control were to one basic objective: finance the next global war before 1914. And they did.
Now, that very fine constitution says, “No state shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debt.” And silver coin, especially the free minting of silver, had already been severely restricted by federal decrees. Now the government was told to create a Federal Reserve system. And who told them? The people to whom the government owed money.
If you have not read G. Edward Griffin’s great book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, now would be a good time to do so. To summarise, tremendously evil people, mostly demon worshippers, pushed through a scheme to impose a central bank on the United States. Doing so was intended to finance one of the worst wars to hit Europe since the Peace of Westphalia at the end of the Thirty Years war in 1648.
In addition to usurping the currency and finances of the United States the same group forced through the income tax amendment. There is abundant evidence that Philander Knox lied and the income tax amendment was never properly ratified, but that doesn’t matter to any of the rich men north of Richmond. There is no recourse, because the Supreme Court doesn’t care if it was properly ratified and has said so in its opinions.
Vatican Usurpation 1958
There is controversy about the conclave of 1958 that supposedly chose Pope John XXIII. It may not be widely remembered, but at the time of the conclave, there was a cardinal named Giuseppe Siri. He was chosen as Pope on the first day of the conclave, and the smoke coming from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel was white for half an hour. Then his position was usurped and the smoke was changed to black. This was done to prevent a good Pope from occupying St. Peter’s seat in 1960 and consecrating the country of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in obedience to the orders given during the miracles at Fatima in 1917.
Who was behind this usurpation? The same freemasons and demon worshippers who would impose Vatican II and attempt to destroy the faith.
Presidential Usurpation 1963
In 1963, mass murderer, psychopath, Wall Street supporter of Hitler and Prescott Bush, and recently fired director of the cia Allen Dulles put together a plan to kill the sitting president of the United States, John F. Kennedy. He did so because he was a vicious, nasty, self-important maniac who hated freedom and enjoyed bloodshed. All the details are available to you in books like Coup in Dallas and Bumper Hornberger’s The Kennedy Autopsy, so I’m not going to dignify your unwillingness to learn the truth with a bunch of links. If you’ve convinced yourself that Lee Oswald was a lone gunman, you should have your soul examined.
As so often happens in the immediate aftermath of the transition from republic to dictatorship, the newly crowned emperor, Lyndon Johnson (aka LBJ) debased the currency in 1964. Just as soon as he could, he revoked the executive order that JFK had signed authorising silver certificates and moving away from Federal Reserve tyranny. He did so saying that “silver is too expensive to be used as money” which is one of the most idiotic economic claims ever emitted by a politician.
Looking at the new administration’s actions, Charles de Gaulle was concerned for his country, France. France had a long history of difficulty with fiat money inflation. In the early 18th Century with the John Law “Mississippi Money” fiasco and at the end of the 18th Century with the assignat and mandat mess, France had suffered greatly from the idiocies of the overproduction of money. Andrew Dickson White wrote the details in his book Fiat Money Inflation in France which you might want to read. Here I’ve included a link to where you can buy the book from Amazon and a link to where you can download the book for free from Mises.org - a site you should visit frequently if you want to avoid emitting idiotic economic claims. The evil and vicious decision of LBJ to remove the silver from the common coinage of the United States in 1964 revealed a plan that had started in 1913 to completely ruin the currency and, thereby, impoverish ordinary Americans for the benefit of European banker aristocrats.
Not only was de Gaulle familiar with the problems of fiat money inflation, he was also deeply aware of the difficulties of foreign occupation of Vietnam, formerly French Indochina. Vietnam was occupied by France at the time of the Versailles treaty negotiations in 1919 when a waiter in Paris named Ho Chi Minh tried to get an audience with Woodrow Wilson. Ho was turned away by racist bureau-rat Eddie Mandell House, so he went to the Soviet delegation who were more interested in liberating the overseas possessions of France. Subsequently the Vietnamese people fought France, Japan, France, the USA empire, and China before becoming more or less independent in 1979 - after sixty years of bloodshed. Long struggles for freedom may be ahead of you, so don’t despair. God is with us to save us. Amen.
Accordingly, de Gaulle insisted that France should redeem its dollars for gold bullion. This led to military airlifts of gold from the United States to London. It led to the London “gold pool” scandal to try to keep the price of gold at $35/ounce. So much gold was placed on the weighing floor at Rothschild’s in London that the system broke and crashed through into the basement. This clever event was orchestrated to close gold redemptions for a while, but the even more clever “gnomes of Zurich” opened their own redemption centre, and the bleeding continued. Eventually the great friend of the cia, Richard Nixon, finished the work by removing the last of the silver from the half dollar and dollar coins and by abrogating the Bretton Woods agreement to redeem the dollar for gold. And as the Oliver Anthony song now goes, “yer dollar ain’ sh!t and it’s taxed to no end.”
Nixon should be placed next to LBJ among the mass murderers for profit who have defiled America’s reputation as a world leader in freedom and independence. With the servile and enthusiastic support of Hank Kissinger, Nixon ordered the non-strategic mass murder bombing of Cambodia and other parts of Southeast Asia. He was personally responsible for millions of deaths. And he did more than any other president to debase the currency and ruin the lives of Americans. Nixon nationalised the railroads, created the occupational health and safety administration (osha), the environmental protection agency (epa), and other agencies for the purpose of emitting enough red tape to disable American industry. He was a terribly evil man who carried forward the evil plans of Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and LBJ because he wanted to enslave mankind for his demon worshipping masters.
For Nixon to be elected president in 1968, with various other shenanigans, it was regarded as essential that Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy be murdered that year. Again, I’m not going to dignify your unwillingness to understand these events as conspiracies by throwing a bunch of links at you. Do your own research ffs.
Education Usurpation
One of the no-longer-studied aspects of the burdensome growth of the evil District of Corruption is how an agency, the office of education, created in 1867 to promote the establishment of agricultural and mechanical schools (like Texas A&M) and state universities for teaching similar topics, came to be a part of the Federal Security Agency. But it did.
What, you may ask, is the Federal Security agency? Obviously it was created to advance the security of the federal government. Today its major functions have been divided into two cabinet-level departments, Health & Human Services (the slaves must be kept healthy until they are no longer useful) and Education. When it was created in 1939, the Federal Security agency oversaw the bureau of education, old age pensions, the public health service, food and drug safety, civilian conservation corps, Roosevelt’s nationalist youth administration (the Hitler Youth for Americans), and the war research service programmes for creating chemical and biological weapons to exterminate anyone who opposed it. At the time, food and drug safety were mostly provided by free market groups including the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, the Underwriters Laboratory, and various newspapers and magazines dedicated to wholesome foods and medicines. The enormously evil and disgustingly enormous food and drug administration grift to toady up to the pharmaceutical industry and force the prices ever higher while approving of the release of dangerous drugs like Vioxx and mRNA vaxxajabs in total regulatory capture, well, that came later.
If you read the communist manifesto of Karl Marx from 1848, it says that getting rid of private and local education is essential. The state must control all forms of education. Anymore, that means a giant feral bureau-rat filled agency that makes demands on local school districts which supports national teacher unions filled with ardent communists who want to molest children while indoctrinating them, and in some instances indoctrinate them while molesting them. How a once-proud people like the Americans have allowed their children to be so generally contaminated by evil is quite beyond me.
You should probably read the communist manifesto to get a sense of what a bunch of hare-brained schemes it promotes. Keep in mind as you read it that the man who wrote it was paid by freemasons to attack all the foundations of Christendom, especially faith in God, the extended family, and private charity. These demon worshippers hate God and, therefore, necessarily, hate God’s creation. When you read the communist manifesto (which I won’t dignify with capital letters) and Das Kapital, you read about ideas for beings who are not at all human. If you want, on the other hand, to understand economics as it really functions, you should read Human Action by Ludwig von Mises. The communists are very open about their hatred of mankind and their desire to create “new soviet man” through beatings, torture, deprivation, and mass murder. What they really want is to celebrate death and worship demons.
A long time ago, one of the founders of this country said that if tax funding were ever used to establish public schools, they would become propaganda mills without any merit. Whether Thomas Jefferson ever wrote that idea on paper doesn’t really matter, to me, just as it doesn’t matter to me whether Isoroku Yamamoto said that he would never invade the mainland United States because there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. The point is not that some authority figure said it, but that it was said, and is true.
The truth is that schools to be worthy of the name should teach gun safety, marksmanship, and the use of survival tools like bows, tomahawks, and snare wire. People ought to grow up knowing how to take care of themselves, of their basic transportation, and of their families. My dad not only taught me calculus, physics, and astronomy, but also auto repair including the use of timing lights, feeler gauges, and a vast array of wrenches. Among the many problems of the big cities, they don’t teach anything in school except mindless obedience to human authorities who have never earned respect and should receive none.
Education has been usurped. If you want to live in a free country in a world-class civilisation, you should spend some time looking into taking it away from the rich men north of Richmond. And if you really want to liberate local education so it is not ruined by the teacher unions and the parasite bureau-rats, you’ll need to take control of your county government with the help of your neighbours. The strength of decentralisation is found in those three thousand plus counties, so you should spend some time understanding yours.
Vatican Usurpation 2013
The problem of usurpation is that the usurpers have gotten a taste for it. So they keep on usurping. They didn’t like Pope Siri so they replaced him, in conclave, with Pope John XXIII. They didn’t like Roman Catholic traditions so they tried to get rid of them with Vatican II - but God was in control so the Society of St. Pius X continues the traditional Latin mass. They didn’t like John Paul I so they poisoned him. Presumably they really liked John Paul II, especially after he tried to usurp the perfected rosary by crafting the illuminati mysteries, a.k.a. the luminous mysteries.
So, in 2013, not liking Benedict XVI, the freemasons persuaded him to resign. Then they manipulated the conclave to cause the further usurpation of the seat of St. Peter by cardinal Bergoglio. Among his other specific provocations and usurpations, the man calling himself pope Francis placed, in October 2019, a pagan idol, an abomination, in the church of St. Mary in Rome.
You may ask yourself what difference does it make to me, a Quaker, who runs the Vatican? You would be wiser to ask what difference it makes to Jesus Christ. For it was Jesus who said to Peter that Peter was the rock on which He would found His church. It is Jesus who rules and reigns, not kings, not popes, and not presidents. As a follower of the teachings of Jesus and of the traditions of the apostles, I believe that Jesus ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty, and comes from there to judge the living and the dead. In my life I have had abundant evidence to support these beliefs. While my beliefs do not require that you believe as I do, and while the teachings of Jesus expressly forbid the use of coercion to gain pretended conversions, I do think that obeying God is much wiser than obeying men.
Many people have turned away from God. God has noticed. And we’re not going to get through the mess we’re in without help from God.
Presidential Usurpation 2020
The problem of usurpation is that the usurpers have gotten a taste for it. So they keep on usurping. They didn’t like John Kennedy, so they murdered him, and they feared his brother Bobby, so they murdered him, too. They didn’t want Dorothy Kilgallen to publish her new understanding of who killed JFK, so they murdered her. They didn’t want Martin Luther King, Jr., to continue pointing out that the war in Vietnam was dishonourable, so they killed him, too. They thought Nixon was just the thing so they got LBJ to give up on re-election, killed Bobby Kennedy, and convinced the Democrats to put <shudder> Hubert Humphrey in front of the public as the nominee.
But they didn’t like Nixon after a while so they got him to replace Spiro Agnew with their buddy Gerald Ford. Then they got rid of Nixon, and had Ford pardon him. Then they were surprised that Ford was unelectable after pardoning Nixon. But Jimmy Carter seemed like their sort of guy, until he signed the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and encouraged the Church committee to reveal some of the cia’s most evil behaviours while also encouraging the select committee on assassinations to dissolve the illusion of the “lone gunman” nonsense pushed by the Warren commission. So they orchestrated events in Iran and got rid of him, too. Then they didn’t really like Ronald Reagan, who had campaigned on getting rid of the departments of energy and education, so they tried to have him assassinated.
It is arguable that the election of 2000 was about as fraudulent as any other before or since, so there was quite a lot of election denial. The election was decided by the Supreme Court, as you may recall. The Demonrats did not like justice Antonin Scalia’s role in pushing for the decision on behalf of Bush, so they eventually arranged for him to be murdered.
Now, the election of 2000 is important because having the son of cia maniac George Herbert Walker Bush and grandson of Hitler financier Prescott Bush in office was key to the work of the “project for a new American century” to justify wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere. George W. Bush, a.k.a., Georgie, was not so bright. He’s shown in a painting with a paper airplane and two Jenga-block towers in rubble on a carpeted office floor.
If you had spent any time looking at the ludicrous claims of the magic bullet (courtesy Arlen Specter, who really made bank on that “theory”) by the Warren Commission, you would have been prepared for the physics-defying claims of the 911 Commission. The truth is that three buildings in New York were demolished, after things that certainly looked like two aeroplanes were flown into two of them. There is abundant evidence that the molten steel found over a month later in the sub-basement levels of “ground zero” in the clean up efforts could not have been melted by jet fuel and office furniture fires. Even the 911 commissioners said that the government lied to them.
So the USAPATRIOT act continued the usurpations. This time all individual freedom and all bodily autonomy at airports was forfeit. In addition, enough simultaneous monitoring of phone calls and Internet connections was demanded to make it possible to amass a vast mountain of surveillance data. The feral gooferment wanted to protect itself from people who want freedom, especially Americans. Later they would work out how to use large language models and advanced computer graphics to make deep fakes of audio and video so they can claim that anyone they don’t like has done any terrible thing they want to make up.
You are, as I mention above, free to believe what you want to believe. I myself do not believe that Joe Biden was chosen as the nominee of the Demonrat party by legitimate procedures nor do I believe that he was elected president. Biden’s presence in the Oval Orifice is a further usurpation of power by the actually most corrupt president in American history, Barack Obama. If you believe that Joe Biden is intellectually competent to operate the feral gooferment, you should have his head examined.
The people who rioted in 2020 and burned buildings in major cities have gotten, at worst, very light sentences. In many cases they have not been prosecuted at all. The people who assembled peacefully in 2021 to petition the government for redress of grievances have been treated brutally, imprisoned illegally, tried in kangaroo courts, falsely convicted, and have been sentenced in several cases to very long terms. The judicial system has also been usurped.
What Should We Do?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. -- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
It says in the Declaration of Independence that we have both a right and a duty to throw off tyranny. I believe resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
I do not believe that the present system is stable. It depends on violence toward the governed, not the consent of the governed. It required a long train of abuses and usurpations to establish, and it requires a continuing train of abuses and usurpations to continue. So, begin by stopping.
Stop trusting the bureau-rats and the official lies. Stop supporting the system. Stop the idolatry of pledging your allegiance to a hunk of cloth. Stop pretending that there are some “white hats” in the military who are going to come to your rescue. Stop cooperating with your own enslavement.
Resist. Protest. Object. But most of all, stop cooperating. Don’t wear masques when they are mandated. Don’t take poison jabs. Don’t file papers in deference to their expectations of you doing so. Don’t trust human hierarchies.
Turn to God. Listen to God. Hear the words of Jesus and do them.
Buy a copy of The Free World Project.
Way back in the Autumn of 2017 a friend of mine introduced me to Chris Boehr. He and I were working on a project called freedom interactive television. He's a space enthusiast like me and worked on the vacuum performance calculations for the descent engine of the lunar excursion module for TRW. He's also a gifted software developer and machine vision ex…
a day ago · 2 likes · 4 comments · Jim Davidson
This book represents the best ideas on how to build free private cities that can network together to make a free world. You won’t find another book like it. It not only covers the philosophical and intellectual issues, but is a practical guide for getting people together to build the free world we want to live in and reduce or end war, genocide, crime, and slavery.
Work together with your neighbours on your county to be sure you are properly represented and to secure the blessings of peace and freedom to yourselves and your posterity.
Have the ambition of not just putting a few bandages on the gaping wounds around you, but of building an actual civilisation. It would be a good idea.
It would be a good idea
·
APR 11
As I wrote in that essay, “Long ago Edmund Burke wrote these words: ‘When bad men combine, the good must associate, or they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.’ For reasons that are not completely clear in the historical record, this actual quotation has been widely summarised as ‘the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,’ which is certainly true but far less useful in terms of guidance.”
Where are you to find good men and women with whom to associate? Look around. Ask in prayer for God to send you where they are, or to send good people to where you are. Feel free to ask me - I know a bunch of people all over the world. I might know someone good near you.
I believe God intends for us to be free and prosperous. I encourage you to pray every day, many times a day. God will show you the best ways forward. Amen
This is a great historical summary, for to understand one's time - the present - one must know where it came from.
I have a couple of addenda to add to your article comments:
Download and read, if you have not, a free PDF copy of F. Tupper Saussy's book, Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge about Governing Bodies in connection with the usurpation of 1789. Tupper goes farther, and one chapter in particular that is insightful is titled "American Graffiti", about the many symbols in Washington DC, including the "Indian" atop the dome of Congress and the obelisk - the Ashteroth pole - that is the Washington Monument. I met Saussy at the National Press Club (NPC) in WDC not long before he died.
Saussy's book also covers the connection between Adam Weishaupt and the Oriental (Paris) Lodge of Freemasonry, and how the courier on horseback from Weishaupt to Paris was struck by lightning and the govt of Baden-Wuerttemberg recovered the documents and outlawed Weishaupt's Illuminati, which 10 Planks is essentially identical to that of Marx. (Coincidence? Only to conspiracy deniers.)
Beyond Edward Griffin's "gold standard" book on money is Edwin J. Vieira Jr's work in two volumes, Pieces of Eight: the Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the U.S. Constitution. He is widely regarded as the leading expert on the historical and legal aspects of U.S. money. Vieira's career (though he had both a PhD in chemistry and a JD, from Harvard) was that of arguing (and winning) cases before the Supreme Court. I met him at the NPC and talked with him for a while there. He uttered one sentence which stuck in my mind regarding the trends in DC and what now is called the Deep State: "The deeper you dig, the dirtier it gets." Those who might suppose that your characterization of prominent figures that they know from media sound-bytes is extreme do not know what Vieira knows. He also wrote a fictional work, The Cra$hmaker, in which a number of Washington figures are given pseudonyms. As I read his (2 volume) novel, I made a list of novel characters and who I thought they were in real life. Ed, being a shrewd lawyer, only pointed out the ones I got wrong.
"... grandson of Hitler financier Prescott Bush" There are people who were in Congress, maybe still alive, who would know whether Prescott Bush spoke with a German accent or not. Bob Michel would have known and I really wish I had asked him (but did not before he died). Antony C. Sutton's coverage of the Bush descent also does not address this basic question.
I read recently that Earl Warren, being an active SCOTUS justice, did not lead the Commission but turned it over to Allen Dulles. It was the Dulles Commission report. Dulles also was not much into physical reality for the purposes of revealing who killed JFK. Bullets and heads are also subject to the law of conservation of momentum.
Great summary. If so interested, here's one of mine that details 1913:
https://frederickrsmith.substack.com/p/creature-from-jekyll-island-a-second